Nic Cage's Snake Eyes sparks Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories on social media

In 2025, Charlie Kirk was murdered in a tragic assassination- this has become a target of crazed internet conspiracy theories! Other social media users compared the 1998 Snake Eyes movie starring Nicolas Cage to the events leading to the death of Charlie Kirk, saying the film somehow foreshadowed events in real life.

There is, however, no confirmed linkage of the film and the assassination. The police confirm that the suspect, Tyler Robinson, was a solitary offender and all claims linking Charlie Kirk’s death to the movie are entirely coincidental.

Although not proven, the name Charlie Kirk has been appearing on social media trends, with users pointing out the similarities between Kirk and the fictional character Charles Kirkland of the movie. Although this analogy is going viral, law enforcement agencies emphasize that such similarities are only coincidental.

It is about the facts of the death of Charlie Kirk and the way Tyler Robinson was being investigated.

The background of the Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories

The Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories were initiated as users observed that the plot of the movie was similar to what was happening in real life. Charles Kirkland, a public official, is killed in Snake Eyes in a high-profile event, which some theorists linked to the public shooting of Charlie Kirk.

There is also an instance of mischaracterization of the suspect, Tyler Robinson, by some online users, with efforts to associate him with minor characters or plots in the film. These coincidences led to viral speculation, which fact-checkers have disproved as having no connection.

Social media amplification

The theories by Charlie Kirk soon went viral on online forums like TikTok and X. Comparisons between Snake Eyes videos and posts and actual footage of Kirk on the streets were made, indicating the possibility of predictive programming. The film trended on hashtags connecting Charlie Kirk and the movie, and the subject became a viral hypothetical hotpot.

Fact-checkers, however, elucidated that the schedule, characters, and events of the film are not accurate, and the assertions are purely speculative.

Authoritative statements and research

Policemen, the FBI, and Utah police have verified that Tyler Robinson was alone. No political party, any organized group, or film conspiracy was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. As per Times of India, CBS News, and NPR, the findings were echoed by the Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, who pointed out that there is no evidence to suggest otherwise, and the perpetrator was just one person.

The personal motives and the text messages provided by Tyler Robinson were questioned, though the experts confirm that there is no plausible alternative story.

The role of misinformation

Expand Tweet

Some foreign actors, including Russia, China, and Iran, tried to take advantage of the Charlie Kirk assassination and disinformation to divide people online. Regardless of these attempts, these campaigns have nothing to do with the factual account of the event.

The viral misinformation that links Charlie Kirk to Snake Eyes falls under this umbrella of misinformation that has been disproven by trusted sources like CNN, NPR, and Axios.

Why do these theories gain traction

The Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories show that social media can quickly transform coincidences into spectacular stories. It is nearly unavoidable that speculation should follow the combo of a high-profile celebrity, a decades-old film, and a tragic situation.

Although the websites provided by certain online communities did give a lot of weight to this statement, the official sources point out that the death of Charlie Kirk is a tragic and isolated case with no links to the media, politics, or international conspiracies.

In short, Charlie Kirk's conspiracy theories about his assassination being related to Snake Eyes have spread widely on the Internet, yet all facts that have been confirmed show that Tyler Robinson acted alone. Police and fact-checkers verify that there are no real parallels between the film and the death of Charlie Kirk, which are purely coincidental.