The federal case involving music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs is progressing, with almost 30 witnesses testifying so far. Their testimonies aim to help prosecutors establish a range of significant criminal accusations. Combs has rejected all five federal charges against him. These charges include accusations of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transporting people to engage in prostitution. Central to the case are testimonies from a select group of individuals whose accounts align with specific elements of the indictment.
The racketeering conspiracy charge stands as the key focus of the prosecution’s case. Prosecutors claim that Combs and his connected businesses functioned as a criminal organization carrying out crimes like sex trafficking, kidnapping, forced labor, arson, and bribery. To make this charge stick, prosecutors need to show that Combs was involved in at least two racketeering acts.
Key Witness Testimonies Revealed in Diddy Federal Trial
Anonymous Witness ‘Jane’
A woman known as “Jane,” using a pseudonym, talked about her relationship with Diddy from 2021 to 2024. She described feeling pushed into sexual situations with others, which she called “hotel nights.” She explained that manipulation and financial control made these incidents happen. Jane also spoke about a physical fight with Combs and how she still relied on him. Her testimony covered three out of the five main charges: racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution.
The defense argued that Jane chose to participate. They highlighted parts of her words where she admitted to enjoying some aspects of the relationship. They also noted that Combs continued giving her financial help.
Cassie Ventura’s Testimony
Cassie Ventura, a singer once signed to Diddy’s label and in a long relationship with him, spent four days giving testimony. She spoke about allegations of being forced into sexual situations she called “freak-offs.” These encounters often involved drugs and male escorts. She shared an account of being assaulted in March 2016 at a hotel in Los Angeles, backed by video evidence shown in court. Her testimony ties to three out of the five charges, including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution.
The defense, during cross-examination, admitted Combs had a history of violence but denied coercion. They argued that the acts were consensual and also pointed to Ventura’s financial settlement and the unresolved hotel-related litigation.
Former Assistant ‘Mia’
One of the witnesses, known as “Mia,” worked under Combs from 2009 to 2017. She spoke about several incidents involving both physical and sexual misconduct. She also described a strict work atmosphere where she had to be available around the clock. Her testimony plays an important role in backing the forced labor claim tied to the racketeering conspiracy charge.
The defense tried to question her reliability by pointing to messages she sent after leaving her job that showed support for Diddy. They also emphasized how no formal complaints were filed during the time these incidents happened.
Kid Cudi
Musician Scott Mescudi, who performs as Kid Cudi, shared his experience about his car being destroyed with a Molotov cocktail after his brief romance with Ventura. While no one faced charges for the act, prosecutors are using his account to build the arson part of a racketeering case.
Eddy Garcia
Eddy Garcia used to work as a security officer at a hotel. He told the court that Diddy gave him $100,000 to hand over hotel surveillance video tied to Ventura’s assault. His statement fits into the accusations of bribery and obstructing justice in the case.
Capricorn Clark
Capricorn Clark, once employed by Combs, spoke about a situation in 2011. She said Diddy forced her at gunpoint to go with him to Mescudi's home. She also talked about enduring long hours and facing violence during her job. Her statement supports the kidnapping accusation.
The trial moves forward with witnesses painting a complex picture of the claims against Diddy. The prosecution aims to reveal patterns tied to racketeering and other crimes. Meanwhile, the defense works to question witness reliability, argue consent, and focus on financial motives.