Candace Owens stirred a fresh controversy by releasing a new image of Charlie Kirk getting shot. On her January 6 podcast, Owens shared a still from a video that captured Charlie Kirk from behind while he was shot. The podcaster pointed out that there was no blood visible from behind and questioned the lack of an exit wound.According to USA Today, the authorities claimed that Charlie Kirk was shot with a Mauser 98, which had a .30-06 caliber. The gun is considered powerful and known for causing bigger damage. While showing an image of Charlie Kirk’s back from the moment he was shot, Owens said:"There's no blood on Charlie. There was absolutely no blood on Charlie. Not only did the bullet not go through, it didn't even cause any sort of destruction. And I follow that video until he goes down. There's nothing that we would expect to see from a .30-06. And again, I have a closeup of this."Image shared by Candace Owens on her podcast (Image via YouTube/Candace Owens)A few stains of blood were visible on Kirk's hand, which Owens claimed came from the front of his neck. She said that the wound pattern didn't make sense to her. The podcaster said that it also didn't make sense to the official "narrative."After Candace Owens scrutinized the authorities' claim by sharing a new image on her show, a flurry of reactions came online. On a clip from Owens’ podcast shared by @ShadowofEzra on X, a user commented:"I’ve witnessed hundreds of gunshots/wounds/trauma to head and neck. The lack of blood produced from this wound is perplexing. As is the trajectory of his head IF he was shot from the front. Law of physics isn’t jiving."Lucy, nurse for the people not profits. @LucciaorLucyLINK@ShadowofEzra I’ve witnessed hundreds of gunshots/wounds/trauma to head and neck. The lack of blood produced from this wound is perplexing. As is the trajectory of his head IF he was shot from the front. Law of physics isn’t jiving.Internet divided after Candace Owens disputes official claim with an image from Charlie Kirk’s shootingA user questioned why the FBI didn't release the full video."Why hasn't FBI or TPUSA reveal this?"Another netizen suggested that the podcaster must be provided security."Candace owens needs to go under witness protection."However, many netizens slammed Owens for making the aforementioned claims. A user commented:"And how exactly does that tear apart the FBI's story since their public stance has always been from Day 1 that their was no exit wound genius?"Another internet user voiced a similar thought."So what…there was no exit wound. Why would you expect to see blood and why do you think this tears apart anything? What part of the FBI’s story does this debunk?? They said there was no exit wound. The only way you would see blood from that angle is if there’s an exit wound."An X user called the photo shared by Owens "clickbait."""At least 90% of that is fake click bait . There was tons of blood and the bullet heyholed him causing a shock wave that went all the way to his toes."A netizen commented that the frame shared by Owens might have been captured immediately after Kirk was shot, before any blood appeared."literally could have been taken a MILISECOND before blood started. This picture LITERALLY PROVES NOTHING!"Apart from releasing the new image, Candace Owens, in the recent episode of her show, cast doubt on Tyler Robinson’s role in Kirk’s murder.Also read: Where was Tyler Robinson the night after Charlie Kirk was shot? Candace Owens reveals new claim