5 House of the Dragon Season 2 plot holes that just don’t add up

House of the Dragon Season 2 delivered fire, fury, and family drama on a level that could match Game of Thrones at its best. Based almost two centuries before Daenerys Targaryen ascended to power, the show explores the notorious Targaryen civil war — the Dance of the Dragons — between competing factions headed by Rhaenyra Targaryen (the Blacks) and Aegon II (the Greens) as they fight over dominance of the Iron Throne. With dragons soaring and plots lurking in the background, viewers anticipated disaster, tragedy, and political genius.

House of the Dragon Season 2 came with high hopes, and by and large, met expectations. The acting remained at its best, the production looked as extravagant as always, and the politics still possessed the razor-sharp quality viewers have learned to anticipate.

It is apparent that the series remains as passionate about the world George R.R. Martin built — and there is a sincere attempt to get this period of Westeros to be as vibrant as its predecessor.

All the same, even the best-told tales often have a few loose ends. Although most viewers loved the drama and dragonfire, many couldn't help but wonder about a few plot points that just didn't add up. Not exactly deal-breakers, per se, but moments that pushed against the fringes of the narrative's internal consistency — the sort of details that give rise to Reddit threads, fan theories, and hours-long YouTube dissections.

Today, we’re taking a closer look at five of the most talked-about inconsistencies from House of the Dragon Season 2, not to nitpick for the sake of nitpicking, but to better understand where the story stretched its own rules.

---

The most confusing plot points in House of the Dragon Season 2

The dragon and the wall

Somewhere in House of the Dragon Season 2, Cregan Stark tells a story about Queen Alysanne and her dragon Silverwing, who allegedly refused to fly beyond the Wall. The scene is creepy — errie, even lyrical — and appears to suggest ancient magic still flowing in the distant North.

However, for too many fans, particularly those who recall Game of Thrones, this tidbit raised an eyebrow. After all, Daenerys's dragons had no problem flying north of the Wall, fighting the White Walkers. So why did Alysanne's dragon hesitate?

It is a strange moment, one that comes close to traditional lore without providing much by way of explanation. Was it the magic of the Wall? Some primal fear? An omen that something awful and ancient still lies dormant beyond it? Or was it merely one of those fairy tale enigmas — something that had been passed down for generations, its meaning forgotten with the passing of time?

House of the Dragon does not explain. And perhaps that is the point. In a franchise that has always made worldbuilding matter, this lack of follow-through felt like a failure to take the mythos deeper. Rather than building new depth to the Wall's magic, it left many of us scratching our heads — not because the concept itself was bad, but because it came without explanation, and then disappeared into thin air.

Nevertheless, it is an episode worth lingering on. Whether it was a subtle whisper of what's outside the Wall or just a plain old narrative flourish, it raised a question that the show didn't appear to be in a position to answer.

---

The shortened season that left everything hanging

If there was one thing viewers in general noticed about this season, it was the pacing. Specifically, the odd lack of it. With only eight episodes rather than the standard 10, the pace of House of the Dragon Season 2 felt… off. Not hasty, per se, but stifled — like a narrative trying to spread its wings within a smaller canvas than it required.

Key plot threads were seeded but left hanging, character developments began to bloom and then suddenly stalled, and just when it appeared that the actual war was going to be fought, it was over. Or, at least, it wasn't.

The final episode felt less like a finale and more like a mid-season turning point, the kind of moment where you would expect the credits to roll and a voice to announce “Next time, on House of the Dragon.” But there was no next time. That was it.

This is not to say what we received wasn't interesting. The slower, character-centric episodes did pack some serious punch, and the Blacks vs. Greens tension was well-expressed. But for so many, the season felt like a prolonged, slow breath with no release — a lovely setup with no payoff. In a tale all about succession, betrayal, and dragons ready to go to war, you want a bit more blaze by the end.

---

Fast travel: Westerosi bypass that refuses to go away

Travel in Westeros has long been a sensitive topic. In the early seasons of Game of Thrones, travel took episodes — even seasons — and you tasted the miles. Characters grew older on the road, allegiances changed, and every extended ride had meaning. But along the way, that distance began to erode, and House of the Dragon has inherited some of that storytelling shorthand.

During Season 2, characters — particularly dragonriders — appear wherever the story requires them. Aemond seems to travel the map at lightning speed, jumping between cities and fortresses without much indication of time elapsing. One moment he is in King's Landing, then he hovers over Storm's End or tracks his foes around the continent. The dragons, as big and awesome as they are, turn into narrative cheat codes.

Now, it is easy to chalk this up to convenience — or maybe even necessity. After all, there is a lot of ground to cover and only eight episodes to do it. The cost, however, is a sense of scale. Westeros begins to feel smaller, less like a sprawling kingdom on the brink of collapse and more like a neighborhood with a dragon-fueled shuttle service.

It's not a fatal flaw, but it does erode the immersion. Because in a world where power is bound to distance, where strategy hinges on travel time and geography, disregarding those logistics makes things feel a little too convenient. And in this world, the convenient seldom equates to the believable.

---

Daemon at Harrenhal: The story that went nowhere

And then there's Daemon. Always a charismatic presence, always volatile, always a little scary. His trajectory this House of the Dragon season was established to be one of the most emotionally stripping — a fall into something darker, more broken. And at the beginning, that was promising.

Sent off to capture Harrenhal, Daemon wandered ghostly corridors and shadowy visions, with literal and metaphorical ghosts. He encountered the mysterious Alys Rivers. He dreamed of dragons and caught glimpses of possible futures that might or might not transpire. It was rich with symbolism and atmosphere — the sort of sidetrack that, in theory, tells us something significant about a character.

And then, nothing.

Weeks went by. Other plotlines accelerated. And Daemon stayed in Harrenhal, stewing in symbolic imagery while the war continued without him. When he finally acted, his trajectory was no longer a slow burn but a narrative cul-de-sac — interesting, but ultimately severed from the larger story. His ultimate reunion with Rhaenyra, though powerful in its execution, seemed disconnected from all that preceded it.

Perhaps there is more to follow. Perhaps this is merely the opening movement in a longer, grander trajectory. But for the time being, Daemon's Harrenhal chapter remains a season-long ellipsis — a lovely question mark never given its answer.

---

Moral whiplash: The characters who can't pick a lane

And then, of course, there's the question of tone — or rather, the question of moral clarity. One of the things that has always made George R.R. Martin's world so strong is that no one is purely good or bad. Heroes get defeated, villains come to power, and everybody exists in shades of gray. But there is a thin line between complication and obscurity, and House of the Dragon Season 2 sometimes crossed over into the latter.

Take Rhaenyra and Alicent. At the heart of the series, their conflict is personal, political, and achingly human. And yet, sometimes the show appears uncertain about how it wants us to feel about either of them.

One episode makes Rhaenyra an honorable heir trying to keep the kingdom intact; the next, she is ordering dissenters assassinated in cold blood. Alicent also changes from a woman bound by obligation to one who is willing to tamper with succession and turn a blind eye to cruelty.

These aren’t contradictions so much as inconsistencies — character turns that happen not because they feel earned, but because the plot demands them. The result is a kind of moral whiplash, where it is hard to know who we are supposed to empathize with, and when. That emotional uncertainty can be compelling… or it can just be disorienting.

Ultimately, House of the Dragon isn't attempting to serve us heroes and villains on a platter, and that's part of what makes it compelling. But when the emotional throughlines begin to fray — when motivation looks as if it is being rewritten from scene to scene — it can be difficult to remain anchored in the story.