Amadeus finale recap and ending explained: Salieri’s confession and the ambiguity of Mozart’s death

Amadeus right away reveals its ending by tackling the most significant question: Has Salieri killed Mozart? The answer is no. However, instead, Amadeus Season 1 eventually investigates how stories are made, changed, and maintained long after those involved are dead.

The very first moments of the finale signal that this is not about finding a solution to the mystery but rather about acknowledging how history turns into narrative. What makes the ending of Amadeus so upsetting is its composure. No last surprise, no verdict dispersed in courtroom style, and no attempt to somehow justify Salieri’s confession.

---

Where the Amadeus finale begins

The last episode of Amadeus opens six months after the passing of Antonio Salieri. Although the city has gotten over it, the impact of Salieri’s written confession still lingers around. Mozart has long been dead, and the series does not take the opportunity to show the audience his last moments as a grand event.

However, the attention is shifted to the consequences, more precisely, the choices of others regarding Salieri’s words. This choice of structure is closely related to the main theme of the series. Amadeus is not the kind of production that wishes to depict the death of Mozart as the most significant dramatic incident. It rather considers death to be the point where the most dangerous process begins: the making of legacy.

---

Constanze Mozart and the fight for legacy

Constanze Mozart is a protagonist, finally, in the end part. The character is still mourning, but now she has to face a new threat, a distortion of the narrative. The rumor of Salieri’s confessions that he was responsible for Mozart's death has started spreading.

Constanze’s reaction is strong and calm at the same time. She does not try to discredit Salieri by making counter-accusations or suggesting other conspiracies. Instead, she simply calls into question the whole basis of the confession. In her case, Salieri’s statement is not an admission of guilt but a final act of self-insertion.

---

Pushkin’s role in the ending

The coming of Alexander Pushkin gives a new perspective to the whole episode. Pushkin is not shown as being wicked or taking advantage of the situation. On the contrary, he represents the very opposite of that: curiosity. It is not the truth of Salieri's confession that attracts him, but the dramatic clarity it offers, where history gives none.

Pushkin's conversations with Constanze reveal the main issue of Amadeus: does truth hold more value than meaning? Pushkin does not pretend that doubts surrounding a tale make it any less strong. To the contrary, it could even become more powerful.

The moment is a direct analogy to how the legend of Mozart and Salieri became part of the culture. The series rather subtly acknowledges that Pushkin's play would become one of the major outlets shaping the public’s understanding of the relationship between the two composers.

---

What the finale shows about Mozart’s death

Most importantly, Amadeus does not show the killing of Mozart at any moment. The flashbacks to the last days of life focus on the sickness, his physical decay, and tiredness. These sequences are in line with the commonly accepted historical view, which says that Mozart died of natural causes and not murder.

Salieri’s presence in those days is full of emotions, but at the same time, it is kept within narrative limits. The series shows him as a person who is greatly envious, spiritually broken, and weighing himself against others, but not a killer. Amadeus shows Salieri's confession as a personal document influenced by fixation and remorse.

---

Salieri’s confession

Salieri’s written confession takes center stage near the end of the story. The series regards it as a constructed narrative rather than a legal or historical document. In the course of the season, Salieri constantly questions the idea that God had favored Mozart with great talent while denying him the same.

By the time of his death, the confession becomes the last resort he turns to in order to reclaim his lost relevance. If he cannot be acknowledged as great, at least he will have the status of being significant. This view is supported by both historical research and the thematic purpose of the series.

There is no evidence in the show that Salieri played a part in Mozart's death. His confession is to be understood as a psychological expression rather than a factual resolution.

---

The requiem and its meaning in the series

The Requiem's appearance in Amadeus is chiefly a symbol rather than a mere plot element. Salieri seizes on Mozart's physical and mental weakness, believing he can finally defeat his rival by commissioning this anonymous music piece. Yet, the Requiem becomes "powerful and exact," a flawless, immortal creation emerging from a dying man.

The Requiem in Amadeus becomes a reminder that genius stands its ground long after the moral life of its creator or the envy have turned into dust. The music remains.

---

The Season 1 finale of Amadeus brings forth the following resolution: The music of Mozart is never silenced because of the genius behind it; he is denied the ultimate reward of being acknowledged as a great artist posthumously. Salieri’s downfall is not being convicted of a crime, but rather his own failure to accept that he is not as good as he thinks he is.

And it is Pushkin, the writer, who keeps the audience in touch with the fact that art can be an immortalizer even when it distorts reality. In letting the viewers linger on doubt instead of giving them resolution, Amadeus remains true to both the historical fact and its own themes.

Also read: Amadeus: Everything we know so far about the upcoming Mozart adaptation starring Will Sharpe and Paul Bettany