BBC's Sherlock solved a century-old mystery — but at the cost of Mary Morstan's legacy

The BBC launch of Sherlock in 2010 made a bold statement: they would attempt to modernize Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s famed detective and preserve his portrayal as a genius and socially aloof creature — if not enhance it. Showrunners Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss succeeded on many levels. They transformed some of Holmes’ stories into contemporary treasures that excited both new viewers and old fans. But to achieve this, they made the controversial decision — still hotly debated nearly ten years later — of altering Mary Morstan’s history.

In Doyle’s works, Mary Morstan has a soft yet tough attribute, being the woman who captures John Watson’s heart in The Sign of the Four and dies off-page soon after. This television adaptation turned her into a covert operative with a morally ambiguous skillset and a secret past.

It was a captivating twist that changed how audiences perceived her — not as Watson’s emotional anchor, but as an enigma subverting his equilibrium. While this gave the show room to resolve one of the major open secrets from the books — how and why Mary died — it served a narrative purpose. However, it also recast her as more of a plot device than the emotionally poignant figure she had always been.

A necessary death that reshaped the narrative of Sherlock

For fans of Conan Doyle’s work, Mary’s death was always a curious gap. She vanishes between stories with little explanation, and Watson is back at Baker Street, bachelorhood restored. Sherlock confronted this head-on, crafting a backstory for Mary that would eventually justify her dramatic exit.

The show cast her as a former intelligence agent with ties to a shadowy past. This provided an in-universe reason for her demise, effectively closing the loop that Doyle had left open. It was clever storytelling, even if it came with controversy.

In any case, the consequences were costly. Through rewriting history, Watson was forced to view Mary in a position filled with nothing but deception and volatility instead of stability and steadiness. While her emotional breakdown may seem massively far-fetched, it definitely felt distant too.

Trending

Instead of mourning a beloved character, the audience was left grappling with moral ambiguity. The showrunners solved a narrative mystery that clever Doyle never did. But in doing so, they lost what made Mary resonate in the first place — her loyalty and unyielding devotion.

Though Sherlock closed some long-open questions, it did so with a narrative sleight of hand that sacrificed heart for resolution. Mary Morstan deserved more than a mystery to solve; she deserved to be remembered as more than a plot device. Her story might be complete now, but her legacy — at least in the world of Sherlock — remains frustratingly incomplete.

×

Was this article helpful?

Thank You for feedback