Dateline: Tangled - What do we know about Ralph Candelario’s crimes? Disturbing details of the 2014 incident, revisited 

Dateline truly has a way of pulling you in slowly and drawing your attention to strange true crime cases and “Tangled” does exactly that. The episode looks back at the 2014 killing of Pam Candelario and the disturbing story her husband, Ralph Candelario, told in the hours and months that followed. So what do we really know about Ralph Candelario’s crimes?

The investigators determined that the murder took place within the couple's home as the intruder narrative collapsed under multiple contradictions, eventually leading to Ralph’s conviction. The case becomes disturbing and strange because everything appeared typical at the beginning

This article revisits Dateline's coverage on the case to explain what occurred in Colorado's rural area and how Ralph's story collapsed and why the case continues to disturb people since its occurrence. This is not about shock for shock’s sake. It is about understanding how a crime hid behind a story that almost worked, at least for a little while.

The facts are disturbing, but they matter, especially when seen through the careful, step-by-step lens that Dateline is known for.

---

Dateline: "Tangled" - The morning Walsenburg woke up to a nightmare

The day started quietly in Walsenburg, the kind of place where neighbors notice when something feels off. Early that January morning in 2014, people heard a man yelling for help outside a brick house near West Third Street.

That man was Ralph Candelario. He was hurt, shaken, and saying something terrifying. According to him, strangers had broken into his home, attacked him, and they were the ones who killed his wife, Pam.

Police arrived and found Pam inside the house. She was dead. At first, there was confusion about what had even caused her death. A shooting was mentioned early on. However, that idea did not last. The investigators later determined she had been beaten and not shot. That shift in the story alone changed the entire tone of the case.

Ralph’s story painted a long, scary night. According to him, two men were inside the house for hours. He described being knocked out, being held hostage, and being forced to wait while his wife lay injured and then died.

In a small town, that kind of story spreads fast. Neighbors were scared. People talked about locking doors, staying alert, even sleeping with weapons nearby. The idea that violent strangers were roaming free shook the community.

Dateline later highlighted how important those first hours of the crime really were. At that stage, law enforcement did not openly challenge Ralph’s account. There was no public pushback. Everything felt uncertain. But as the dust settled, details began to clash. What seemed like a clear case of a home invasion slowly started to look like something else entirely.

---

Ralph Candelario’s story and why it raised red flags

From the start, Ralph Candelario talked a lot. He did not just speak to police. He wrote a long letter and shared it with a local newspaper. The letter was emotional, detailed, and also extremely graphic. He walked the readers through his night almost minute by minute, describing sounds, injuries, fear, and confusion.

Dateline spent time on this letter for a reason. On the surface, it looked like a grieving husband trying to explain the unexplainable. But when investigators looked closer, parts of the story felt strange and pieces of the puzzle did not seem to fit all too well. Some details were too specific. Others shifted over time. Certain claims did not line up with the physical evidence inside the house.

One of the biggest issues was timing. Ralph said the intruders stayed for hours. That raised a simple question. Why would burglars linger so long in one home, especially after committing such a violent act? Another problem was the lack of clear signs pointing to unknown attackers. No solid trail led outside the house.

Dateline also noted how Ralph continued to add to his account. He drew sketches of the supposed intruders. He pointed out places in the house where he claimed he was attacked. Each new detail gave investigators more to compare, and more chances to spot contradictions.

This is where the case shifted. The story that once caused fear began to cause doubt. Investigators did not rush. They watched, listened, and recorded. Over time, the version of events Ralph shared no longer matched the evidence they were gathering. The tale that had sounded dramatic started to feel constructed.

---

Inside the house where the crime really unfolded

The crime scene itself told a quieter but stronger story. Pam Candelario was found on the kitchen floor. The injuries she suffered showed she had been struck more than once. Investigators later linked those wounds to a fireplace poker found inside the home. That detail mattered because it suggested the weapon came from within the house, not from someone who arrived prepared.

Blood evidence also played a key role. The patterns showed how Pam was hit and where she was when it happened. This was not random chaos. It was controlled, close, and deeply personal. Dateline walked viewers through how forensic findings challenged the idea of outside attackers.

Another important point was the broken glass at the back door. Ralph described it as part of the break-in. Investigators questioned when that glass was actually broken and why no one nearby heard anything during such a long and violent event. In a quiet neighborhood, hours of movement and noise should have drawn attention.

The house itself became a witness. Rooms, stairs, and doorways were examined again and again. Each pass through the home took investigators further away from the intruder theory. What Dateline made clear is that crimes often unravel not through one big clue, but through many small ones that refuse to fit the original story.

By the time the case moved forward, the house on West Third Street was no longer just a place where something terrible happened. It was proof that the truth was closer than Ralph wanted anyone to believe.

---

The long investigation and the moment charges were filed

This was not a fast case. Months passed after Pam’s death. During that time, Ralph stayed in contact with law enforcement. He appeared to cooperate. He answered all of their questions. He walked through the house with investigators. All of these interactions were documented.

Dateline highlighted how patience defined this investigation. Authorities did not arrest Ralph right away. Instead, they compared statements, reviewed recordings, and matched them against physical evidence. Over time, the gaps became impossible to ignore.

In October 2014, investigators decided they had enough. Ralph Candelario was arrested and charged with first degree murder and tampering with evidence. The arrest did not happen in Walsenburg. He was taken into custody in California and then brought back to Colorado.

For many watching, this was the turning point. The man who once stood on a sidewalk crying for help was now being accused of killing his own wife. Dateline showed how that shift felt heavy, especially for Pam’s family.

The investigation also reopened old questions. Viewers learned that Ralph’s first wife, Dena, had been missing since 2004. Dateline did not accuse him of another crime, but the timing and circumstances added a chilling layer to the story. Suddenly, Pam’s death did not feel like an isolated tragedy anymore.

---

Trial, verdict, and a life sentence

The trial began years after the murder, giving both sides time to prepare. Prosecutors focused on evidence and inconsistencies. The defense challenged the investigation and Ralph’s treatment by authorities. Dateline presented this phase carefully, showing how each side tried to shape the narrative.

Jurors listened to testimony, watched recorded interviews, and studied forensic findings. The trial lasted weeks. Deliberations lasted days. In the end, the jury found Ralph Candelario guilty.

The verdict was quiet. There were no dramatic outbursts. Ralph showed little emotion as the decision was read. Pam’s daughters, who attended the trial, were overcome. Their reactions reminded viewers that behind every crime story are people who have to live with the outcome.

Ralph was sentenced to life in prison without parole. A reported suicide attempt delayed sentencing briefly, but the final decision stood. Dateline treated this moment with restraint, letting the facts speak louder than commentary.

Justice, in this case, came slowly. But it came.

---

Years later, Dateline’s “Tangled” continues to unsettle people because it shows how easily a story can hide the truth. Ralph Candelario did not run. He did not disappear. He stayed and talked, and for a while, that worked.

The episode reminds us that crimes do not always look like crimes right away. Sometimes they look like confusion, fear, and heartbreak. Dateline excels at showing that gray area, where belief and doubt collide.

Revisiting the Ralph Candelario case is not about reopening wounds. It is about understanding how the truth emerged from a carefully told lie. What we know about Ralph Candelario’s crimes comes from patience, evidence, and a refusal to accept easy answers. Pam Candelario’s death was first framed as the work of strangers, but it was ultimately understood as something far closer to home.

The case also raises quiet questions about trust, especially within relationships. There were no signs of a break in life. There was no public history of violence. That makes the ending harder to process.

“Tangled” shows how stories can distract, confuse, and delay justice, but not stop it forever. For viewers, the case is a reminder to look beyond the surface and to remember the victims at the center of these narratives.

---

Stay tuned to SoapCentral for more updates and stories from NBC's Dateline