Dateline has always been interested in cases of crimes that are not so loud and clear but eventually end up being violent. And the new episode of Dateline: The Figure in the House starts with one such incident that immediately makes the viewers uneasy!
Everything was just as it was supposed to be, just another weekday afternoon, a normal check of a home security system, and then a very wrong thing - a human figure moving inside a house that was supposed to be empty. That particular incident was merely a part of a large event, but it proved to be enough to unleash a process that would uncover not only a crime but also court battles.
The death of Jill Halliburton Su, from 2014, remains one of the most chilling cases the show has picked up and investigated. While the killing did appear to be puzzling and contradictory at the onset, it became evident that the witness was not ambiguous but conclusive.
Taking a look at the case today, it becomes very hard to miss the fact that reality can change with lightning speed, and that it is not a matter of beliefs, but rather facts that lead to justice.
Here are 5 harrowing details about Jill Halliburton Su's murder, revisited by Dateline: The Figure in the House
1. The surveillance image that sparked alarm
On the 8th of September 2014, when the concern about the house began, Dr. Nan-Yao Su, the husband of Jill Halliburton Su, was at his workplace. He accessed the live feed of the home security system and discovered something that made him feel very uncomfortable: an individual moving inside the house. Shortly after, the video feed cut out.
This was a very important aspect of the Dateline story, as the video was live only and not recorded, which meant that the police could not see what happened during that live camera time afterwards. But still, this very short viewing was enough to suggest the presence of someone inside.
He then contacted his grown-up son, Justin, who lived nearby, and requested him to go and take a look at the house. This was the step that would eventually lead to the uncovering of a crime of violence.
2. A shocking discovery in the bathroom
Justin Su's approach to the house was coupled with the impression that the front door itself was not locked. As he entered the house, he caught the sound of the running water and followed the sound to the bathroom, where he found the appalling sight of his mother face down in the tub with red water caused by the presence of blood.
The autopsy revealed that Jill Halliburton Su was stabbed over twenty times. Not only were her wrists and ankles tied, but also the array of her wounds and the state of the site were such that it could not beargued that natural causes had led to her death.
Waiting just a short time, ambulance staff and police were dispatched, the residential unit being placed under isolation as a homicide scene.
Dateline shows this instant in time without adding anything, relying solely on confirmed investigative results. The family's lifestyle of peace in the gated community was brutally juxtaposed with the crime.
3. A confusing crime scene and early scrutiny
Initially, when detectives embarked on this case, they were presented with a confusing scene. This was in addition to the fact that the drawers were open, and all their belongings were disheveled. The removal of the security cameras only worsened this confusion. The broken glass at a rear door hinted at a probable point of entry.
Among the two knives that were recovered from the scene, one was identified as belonging to Justin Su, and the other was found near the front door, and the one that was discovered in the bathtub. These circumstances initially attracted the attention of the investigators toward him. As reported in Dateline, his activities, communications, and timeline were thoroughly investigated.
Actually, the CCTV footage from the adjacent houses and the gated community later confirmed Justin's alibi, thus clearing him. This part of the investigative process has helped to demonstrate the potential for first taking the wrong direction and the importance of obtaining confirmatory evidence.
4. DNA evidence identifies an unrelated intruder
The case's turning point came about, thanks to forensic testing. The DNA that was collected from one of the bloody knives found at the crime scene was not a match for any of the Su family members. Instead, it was a match for Dayonte Resiles, who was a man with a history of burglaries that targeted the wealthy, and thus the area through which he entered was implied to be leading towards the Su’s, who had a high social status.
Resiles was not known to have any personal ties to Jill Halliburton Su. The police investigation revealed that he was swept up in a string of local burglaries occurring during the same period. Prosecutors then alleged he broke into the Su residence with the intention of stealing and ended up face-to-face with Jill, leading to a violent encounter.
Dateline emphasizes the fact that this theory was based on the evidence from the trial itself, not just conjecture. The DNA match became the most powerful evidence found in the trial.
5. A rare courthouse escape complicates the case
In 2016, Dayonte Resiles was on trial when he found a way to evade custody and break out of a Broward County courthouse. Dayonte was assisted by a fellow prisoner and was able to free himself from the chains. He ran out of the facility in front of everyone. His flight was considered a big security problem at the courthouse and led to a manhunt of several days.
The criminal lived like this for almost a week before being arrested at a hotel. The period did not witness any further violence. Dateline takes this incident as part of its facts timeline and points out how it caused a delay in the trial, and also how long the victim’s family had to wait for the final decision to be made.
Why Dateline revisited “The Figure in the House.”
Dateline wentback to this case because it is a mirror of the current investigatory methods: the use of surveillance, the weight of DNA, and the pitfalls of hasty conclusions.
The episode sets out how the events in the case unfolded, so that the audience is able to witness the events emerging without being affected by any form of conjecture or narrative devices.
Jill Halliburton Su is also one of the most chilling cases that have ever aired on Dateline. The case from start to conviction in a jury serves as an indicator of how violence could creep in without being noticed, and how forensics are essential in revealing information.
Dateline: The Figure in the House headline suggests that this documentary story is a true crime case that exhibits instantaneous brutality, exhaustive investigations, and a lengthy delay before witnessing any form of justice.
Also read: Dateline : Before Daylight - 5 harrowing details about Jesse Valencia's murder, revisited