How did The Gilded Age Season 3 turn Charles Fane into its most hated antagonist? 

How did The Gilded Age Season 3 turn Charles Fane into its most hated antagonist?  (Image Via HBO)
How did The Gilded Age Season 3 turn Charles Fane into its most hated antagonist? (Image Via HBO)

HBO’s The Gilded Age introduces morally grey characters, driven by social ambition and personal loyalty, along with some survival instincts. But season 3, episode 1 flipped the script by elevating a once-minor character into a full-blown antagonist, creating what may be the show’s clearest "villain".

Bertha Russel and Agnes Rhijn have always operated within the rigid rules of their worlds. Their actions seem harsh in The Gilded Age, but often roots from loyalty to their class, family, and pride. But turning Charles Fane into an antagonist, not for money or status but pure sabotage and manipulation, is what is mind-boggling and a major shift in the tone.


Charles Fane is the new antagonist of The Gilded Age Season 3

While HBO has yet to confirm it in official press, fan chatter and early reviews point towards this one name— Charles Fane, who has the potential to become a major antagonist in season 3. This comes as a significant change as there’s now someone intentionally sowing discord, not just playing defence. The character will sow seeds for long-standing rivalries and challenge the show's usual idea that everyone is doing their best to survive the brutal society.

Charles Fane's sudden rise as a social saboteur, especially against his own wife, Aurora, isn't just some personal drama that can happen with anyone. It portrays how easy it is for him to unsee her wife's hurt and defamation in a society that always blames the woman. This event also portrays the condition of women at that age. The divorced women often face exclusion from polite society and lose legal standing and inheritance rights. Therefore, while Aurora needs to depend on their relatives, Charles is the man who could still remarry.

This incident matters because this can cause a gradual fade of Aurora from society and thus a shift in the alliance. Charles, now clearly a villain, may become a tool to explore the hypocrisy of Gilded Age morality.


Charles not only divorces Aurora but socially executes her in The Gilded Age Season 3, here's how

Aurora Fane has always been one of the more decent, empathetic figures in New York high society. She's a bridge between old and new money, and a quiet but firm supporter of women like Marian Brook and Bertha Russell. Charles not only asked for a divorce — he did so without warning, and then immediately publicly disclosed his affair by bringing his mistress to a party in their home. He shamed Aurora publicly while other women simply distanced themselves from her. This social execution of Aurora by Charles says a lot about the character.

Unlike other morally grey characters in The Gilded Age who are at least wrestling with ambition or loyalty, Charles shows no internal conflict. He doesn’t seem to care about how his actions destroy Aurora’s reputation or security, but casually reasserts power.

When Charles calls Agnes “Aunt Agnes” at Aurora’s event in The Gilded Age Season 3, she immediately shuts him down, asserting,

“You are no longer family.”

This may seem like a social snub — but in the world of Gilded Age propriety, it’s a public condemnation. Agnes believes that Charles has disgraced Aurora and his behaviour has damaged the family's reputation.

It reinforces Agnes’ unwavering loyalty to her family’s women and her refusal to tolerate public scandal, and reflects how a personal shift in relationship can cause a shift in entire social bonds. It shows that in The Gilded Age, blood and reputation outweigh sentiment.

Edited by Zainab Shaikh