'%20x='0'%20y='0'%20height='100%25'%20width='100%25'%20%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20xlink%3Ahref=''%3E%3C/image%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Post the release of Stranger Things' final season, I was thinking that every time a sci-fi TV show hits the screen, modern scientists gauge the parameters it is based on and whether they can be true. It happened when Star Trek came, and when Space: 1999 to Doctor Who came. However, the fact that Stranger Things avoided many of the pitfalls that often have impacted some of the most beloved science-fiction series genuinely makes me happy.
The science shows, sometimes about time travel, other times about some other scientific real concept put together wrongly, have also taken bounces at times, and break their own internal logic. These shows are known to profess a degree of scientific legitimacy, all the while quietly misapplying some real concept, and for this reason, they have also appeared in headlines.
On the other hand, Stranger Things, though being a sci-fi, focuses more on deepening its fictional world and sticking to some primary scientific facts. It digs into feelings, consequences, and natural laws rather than picking up on real scientific concepts with half-knowledge.
**Disclaimer: The article is the author's opinion; the reader's discretion is advised.
Here are the 5 major mistakes Stranger Things refrains from committing, unlike most sci-fi franchises
1. Using real scientific concepts the wrong way
As mentioned, it was disappointing to see Battlestar Galactica, for example, conflate mitochondrial Eve with the most recent common ancestor. What Stranger Things does is skate above this altogether by simply not giving scientific names to whatever puzzle the mystery puts forward. The Upside Down is not meant to look like a misunderstood physics concept. But it is nothing you really know, and the series never outpaces by pretending to be as scientifically accurate.
2. Changing the science of physics to its convenience rule
Many series bend the rules of science when the story requires. Like the ever-changing faster than the speed of light in Battlestar Galactica, to the breaking of the known laws of physics with warp travel in Star Trek. Meanwhile, from the outset, the Netflix show has clear rules.
One of them is that portals don’t open without consequences, psychic powers have a price, and nothing operates instantaneously. So these rules are iron-clad, and they make the stakes feel real. Even Upside Down functions on set principles that never deviate.
3. Violating the physical rules of basic reality
Many of those series, like Space: 1999, were critiqued for disregarding basic physics, such as gravity and mass, as if the moon could be treated as though it were Earth. Stranger Things is anchored in physical reality. It makes it clear and plays on the fact that trauma is real and so are environments, and the human body is fragile. The horror feels authentic as the show treats death, trauma, and loss as finite.
4. Taking time travel as an escape card
Doctor Who thrives on the fantasy of being able to change the past there and then, while the scientists believe that any such action will lead to a paradox. Meanwhile, Stranger Things smartly steers clear of time travel as a narrative crutch. Death, trauma, and loss are forever, and the past cannot be rewritten. That permanence is what gives the story the emotional punch. It plays with the concept of time and space, and a fictional rupture that has been created.
This way, science is just there to help a mood and build tension, not to explain every plot point. This allows Stranger Things to focus on the fear of characters and emotional scares.
5. Explaining too much about the impossible
Tons of sci-fi shows feel the need to explain impossible technology with pseudo-science elements such as gravity generators, cloaking devices, or magical machines. Stranger Things resists that urge and only for good.
Hawkins Lab’s experiments are deliberately opaque, disturbing, and morally dubious. The failure to explain everything brings a kind of uncertainty and adds to the undefeated nature of the Vecna, and this makes the horror stronger and keeps the story focused on the characters.
Trending
Therefore, we can say that these were some factors that make Stranger Things unique while also keeping it safe from the critique and analysis of the experts.
Reply
