New face, old sword: The Witcher’s risky bet on meta-narrative recasting

Liam Hemsworth will not only be combating mythical creatures as he plays Geralt in The Witcher Season 4. He will also tackle a devoted fanbase and the ghost of Henry Cavill’s landmark portrayal. The series suffered tectonic trauma with his departure due to it revolving around his smoldering gravitas and loving, nerdy regard for the IP. How does a fantasy powerhouse like The Witcher manage a mid-series protagonist replacement without losing the story's essence?

Netflix seems to believe the answer lies in embracing the weird and winking. Rather than brushing off the visual change, the series is reportedly leaning into meta-commentary, allowing in-universe characters to directly acknowledge that Geralt now looks different. But instead of going the obvious route — say, letting fan-favorite bard Jaskier comment on Geralt's “new face” with a toss of his lute and a knowing smirk — the show is introducing deep-cut lore characters like Stribog and Nimue to narrate Geralt’s story from a folkloric future.

This is a unique approach as it balances on slippery ground. It works in theory at least, and the use of unreliable narrators as well as fairy tale devices match the series’ mythic tone. Still, the choice to lean on lesser-known figures to achieve such a monumental turn is daring for all the wrong reasons. This only begs to differ; is this sophisticated narrative risk or too many leaps?

A fairy tale fix or folklore fumble?

No one will dispute that the metanarrative serves as a frame for storytelling in fantasy genres - A Princess Bride transformed a favorite film into ‘grandpa's read’ story hour. The Witcher stems from Eastern European folk tales and is rich with lore that gives rise to such stories, making it ideal for more intricate narratives. In theory, permitting Stribog, for instance, to narrate Geralt’s stories with disclaimers like “he didn’t really look like that” is endearing and very much in character. It allows creative leeway to recast the protagonist while keeping narrative cohesion intact.

But there’s a difference between whimsical and whiplash. Bringing in Stribog and Nimue — characters canonically set a century in the future — primarily to justify a casting change, feels a bit like setting the banquet table just to serve a glass of water. Their involvement might make sense for lore purists, but casual viewers could find themselves wondering why these new faces are suddenly gatekeeping a familiar story. The series may be at risk of over-explaining what could have been a single smartly delivered joke.

Why Jaskier should’ve handled the switch in The Witcher

If a character were built for meta-commentary, it’s Jaskier. He’s the fourth-wall-flirting bard whose ballads narrate Geralt’s legend and whose sarcasm has already served as the series’ de facto fan voice. Having him remark, with signature snark, that “the White Wolf’s jawline changed somewhere between Kaer Morhen and reality” would have been elegant, funny, and completely in character.

Trending

Instead, the writers have opted for a more literary device — that of the unreliable narrator — to bridge the visual dissonance. It’s a choice that shows ambition but also hints at a certain nervousness about audience acceptance. Ironically, the bard who built Geralt’s legend in-universe is being sidelined at the very moment the legend needs to be re-spun. The risk? A recasting meant to be seamless could end up drawing more attention by dancing around the obvious instead of nodding to it with a grin.

If Netflix can thread the needle — honoring both Cavill’s legacy and Hemsworth’s fresh take — The Witcher might just pull off one of the most daring soft reboots in modern fantasy TV. But much like Geralt himself, it’ll have to do it with a steady hand, a sharp edge, and hopefully, a bit of dry humor.

×

Was this article helpful?

Thank You for feedback