Why did Captain Simon Metcalfe ambushed the Hawaiians in Chief of War? Speculations explored

In Apple TV+ drama Chief of War, Captain Simon Metcalfe's rampage through his own village in Hawaii is built as a stunning and climactic showstopper! The drama relocates an event that actually occurred over the back-story onto the 1790 Olowalu Massacre, blending fact and fiction.

Historically, the encounter has been well-documented to have been one of the first and most violent confrontations between Westerners and Hawaiian Natives. American-British-born Pacific fur marine trader Captain Simon Metcalfe traded and operated in the Pacific in the late 18th century. Metcalfe encountered Hawaiian Islands at a period when European and American trade were on the rise, as well as cultural misunderstanding and intermittent violence being the norm.

Metcalfe's killing of Olowalu in Chief of War is justified as a response to betrayal, within the general historical process of revenge and reassertion of control by foreign businesspeople in Hawaii.

---

The Olowalu Massacre in Chief of War

Olowalu Massacre was on some unspecified date in April 1790 when Captain Metcalfe moored his vessel, the Eleanora, off Maui. When he asked that a small boat be taken out to his vessel, it was stolen, and shipwatch was killed trying to inquire about something.

Retaliation had landed Metcalfe on the beach in Olowalu village and had invited natives to paddle on over and trade. But Metcalfe had been loading shot and ball into his guns silently. When Hawaiians paddled up in canoes, Metcalfe ordered his men to fire, and they killed around 100 and wounded hundreds more.

This incident has been described as one of the earliest major acts of Western violence in Hawaii and had short- and long-term consequences. The massacre cemented the lethal power of cultural misunderstanding and foreigners' moral transgressions in order to safeguard their interests.

Chief of War series recognizes this war, symbolizing unfortunate aftermaths of first contact and not being literally so.

---

Motivations behind Metcalfe’s actions in Chief of War

Some of the reasons most likely necessitated Metcalfe to attack Hawaiians:

Revenge at once – Theft of the little boat and killing of the watchman were personal grievances against Metcalfe. History stresses the fact that he believed the attack a punishment so that theft and attack would no more be attempted.

Cultural confusion – Metcalfe's reaction is also confusion of Hawaiian governmental and social norms. Being rude or lying in a Western society, here, was standard neighborhood behavior.

Exercise of power – As a foreign trader in a foreign country, Metcalfe would have most likely attempted to exercise power. Expansion of military power was an exercise of power over indigenes and power over trade routes.

Economic motives – Traders such as Metcalfe were motivated by valuable substance and control of strategic ports. By showing them what would happen if he was deposed, he could avert that and gain future trading benefit.

---

The destiny of Thomas Metcalfe and the Fair American in Chief of War

One of the strongest impacts that Metcalfe's movements had was that he brought his son, Thomas, with him, who commanded a smaller ship named the Fair American. The majority of the crew and Thomas were eventually killed by Hawaiians led by Chief Kameʻeiamoku, with the exception of Isaac Davis.

Historians perceive this ancient irony or poetic justice that fierce crimes are capable of triggering a chain reaction, the impact of which the offenders cannot regulate.

---

Immediate and long-term effects in Chief of War

The Olowalu Massacre left both a short-term and lasting impact on Hawaiian society:

Loss of life – Slaughtering of about 100 villagers had an instantaneous impact of leading to shock and turmoil in society.

Fear and mistrust – The massacre instilled universal fear of Westerners that conditioned later contact.

Political effect – The massacre exposed Hawaiian defense weaknesses and shaped colonist chief political relationships.

Cultural memory – The massacre remains a living component of Hawaiian oral history and historical awareness, recalled as a reminder of foreign threat.

---

Speculation and analysis of Chief of War

Historians still debate Metcalfe's motivation. Some characterize the ambush as retaliatory, partially. Others see it as an intimidation tactic intended to seize control of commerce and safeguard economic interests.

Chief of War affirms these assumptions in depicting Metcalfe's actions as reactionary as well as cunning in intent, thus reflecting the nasty dynamic of fear, power, and cultural illiteracy.

It also needs to understand larger trends in American and European behavior in Hawaii in order to understand what Metcalfe is doing. Violence and war were the norm and not the exception in larger trends in the late 18th century when the traders stalked for resources and authority in the Pacific.

The Chief of War series fictionalizes history such as the Olowalu Massacre and looks back at it with a perspective to commenting on such dynamics and allowing the reader to develop a humanized perspective towards Hawaiians as much as foreigners visiting.

---

Captain Simon Metcalfe's assault of Hawaiian villagers, in Chief of War, brings nearer to us the Olowalu Massacre. His reasons would most probably have been immediate vengeance, cultural insensitivity, demonstration of authority, and protection of economic interests.

Their consequences were catastrophic, with mass human loss of life, terror, and reorganization of social and political systems in Hawaii. The fate of his son Thomas and the Fair American carry an element of irony in history in that they offer unexpected results of ferocious conflict.

Also read: You can’t deny that Ka’iana and Kamehameha are slowly turning against each other in Chief of War